1/4/2024 0 Comments Voting blocs and behaviors![]() When a particular election becomes particularly “salient” to you (because of publicity, and possibly a connection to an issue of personal interest), you are more likely to vote. In psychological explanations of voter turnout, most of the electorate is motivated to vote by some mix of personal appeals and encouragement by the media. Some Conceptions about Voting and Decision Making Therefore, instead of eliminating uncertainties from the outputs, outcomes are given in a probabilistic form, informing the stakeholders about the risks directly associated with decision analysis outputs and the outcomes they may select. ![]() The latter method helps with mapping uncertainties from input to output while simplifying it. The fuzzy problem solving approach assumes that stakeholders’ preferences have some uncertainty that can be evaluated at different degrees to evaluate its impact on the decision (Rastgoftar et al., 2012). ![]() Sensitivity analysis evaluates internal uncertainty by altering performance measures and weights to test the feasibility of solutions. The first two methods use stochastic inputs to generate deterministic output, and thus do not fully inform the decision maker about the magnitude of risk associated with the selected outcomes. Uncertainty in environmental decision making problems have been mainly handled through sensitivity analysis, fuzzy decision analysis, and Monte-Carlo selection approaches. A responsible and comprehensive decision making analysis must inform the stakeholders about the effects of the involved uncertainties on the selected decision and its risk of failure. Ignoring the uncertainties involved in different components of a decision making problem, most importantly in input information, can result in misleading outcomes. Uncertainty could be internal-relating to the decision makers’ notions and judgments (Isendahl et al., 2009), or external-relating to the imperfect information of the problem (Figueira et al., 2005). Uncertainty is integral to voting and decision making. Conceptions and Theories about Voting and Decision Additionally, methods that rely on ordinal ranking information are less sensitive to the uncertainty in input information when such information is provided in quantitative (cardinal) terms, making them less controversial and more robust in practice (Madani and Lund 2011). This makes the decision process quick, transparent, and convenient to handle even in large groups (Kangas et al., 2007). voters’ expressed preference orders over the alternatives. Voting methods do not require detailed quantitative information as they rely on ordinal information, i.e. So, they do not cause in mistrust of the decision makers (Gregory, 2002), who might find mathematically sophisticated MCDM, game theory, and bargaining methods somewhat confusing. Voting methods are normally simple to understand and appreciate by a large group of decision makers and the general public. Voting or social choice rules are different methods of aggregation of decision makers’ votes for their preferred options and have been proposed for developing transparency and fairness (Nurmi, 2010). Voting is an important way to make group decisions. In the face of the incentive policy of voting mechanism, the enthusiasm of the audience to participate in voting interaction is very high, which not only brings considerable economic benefits to the platform, but also causes the academic research on voting behavior. The voting mechanism in the program is also different from that in the past: ordinary users of Tencent video have 11 votes a day, while VIP users have 121 votes of voting privilege in addition, when purchasing a customized membership card for players, one can also vote for another 121 votes. Different from the voting mechanism of previous talent shows, which is mainly based on the voting of professional judges, the program put forward the concept of “the founder of the whole people” from the very beginning, and the audience voted to decide the players to stay. “Creation 101” comes from the South Korean program named “Produce 101”, which is a draft class reality show, in which the audience votes to decide the members. The huge social influence brought by it made the program be evaluated as “phenomenon pop variety show” by the media. In 2018, the reality TV show “Create 101” ended successfully with a total broadcast volume of more than 4.73 billion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |